I have set up a machine for using glide games under Windows 98 - I wanted to get Diablo 2 working without too many slowdowns, but using Glide because that looks best and without having to keep swapping the video cable [which means using either V2 SLI or a V3/V4/V5]. For various other reasons I ended up using a gigabyte 7ixe4 board with an athlon 1GHz and 512mb ram.
Diablo 2 runs faster than it did with k6/2+, though still some slowdowns [which I suspect are due to loading data from disk, so there's not much I can do there - it's a 7200rpm hard drive].
But being curious I tried quake 3, original release, timedemo on demo001. According to the [old] reviews you can google for, I should be able to get 70/80/90 fps with this system. But on 1024x768 with everything on max, all I get is 31.4. This is running amigamerlin 2.9 drivers.
I have found the system seems to speed up when I set the core clock to 166 [the default for v5?] compared to "disabled" [which ought to make no difference I think] but still nowhere near the reported fps figures.
This doesn't seem credible... I got similar scores to this with the card in a different machine [p3] running windows 2000.
Any ideas? The drivers report both vsa-100's and 64mb ram, so it doesn't look like one of the gpu's isn't working.
Diablo 2 runs faster than it did with k6/2+, though still some slowdowns [which I suspect are due to loading data from disk, so there's not much I can do there - it's a 7200rpm hard drive].
But being curious I tried quake 3, original release, timedemo on demo001. According to the [old] reviews you can google for, I should be able to get 70/80/90 fps with this system. But on 1024x768 with everything on max, all I get is 31.4. This is running amigamerlin 2.9 drivers.
I have found the system seems to speed up when I set the core clock to 166 [the default for v5?] compared to "disabled" [which ought to make no difference I think] but still nowhere near the reported fps figures.
This doesn't seem credible... I got similar scores to this with the card in a different machine [p3] running windows 2000.
Any ideas? The drivers report both vsa-100's and 64mb ram, so it doesn't look like one of the gpu's isn't working.