3dfxzone.it WorldWide Community

Hardware Tuning & Testing => Benchmarking => Topic started by: qrazi on 11 November 2003, 10:14:41

Title: Driver comparison
Post by: qrazi on 11 November 2003, 10:14:41
voodoolizer 1.05.03
3dmark 2000         :4021
Counterstrike      :60.9
Unreal Tournament      :82.1
3dmark2001SE      :2330
quake3arena         :75.6   
Enemy Territory      :52.2
UT2k3            :44.4   

voodoolizer 1.05.00
3dmark 2000         :5495
Counterstrike      :63.1
Unreal Tournament      :81.0
3dmark2001SE      :2426
quake3arena         :47.5
Enemy Territory      :53.2
UT2k3            :68.2 + flicker error

3dHQ 1.09.00 beta 10
3dmark 2000         :4383
Counterstrike      :54.5
Unreal Tournament      :75.1
3dmark2001SE      :2355
quake3arena         :83.8
Enemy Territory      :44.9
UT2k3            :67.5 + flicker error

Amigamerlin 3.0
3dmark 2000         :4065
Counterstrike      :53.1
Unreal Tournament      :78.1
3dmark2001SE      :2351
quake3arena         :81.0
Enemy Territory      :48.79
UT2k3            :66.2

Voodoolizer 1.05.03 + x3dfxgamers 1.18a bios @ Quake3
166.1            :71.7
170.4            :73.7

on a XP 1825+ (147mhz FSB), 256mb pc 133, voodoo5 5500 agp 1.18 bios, win2k + SP4.
funny thing about that x3dfxgamers bios: overclocking actually shows in benchmarks, but you will need very good cooling...

Title: Driver comparison
Post by: NitroX infinity on 11 November 2003, 11:08:32
Were all tests done at 32bit and are you absolutely sure about it?
How many times did you run the benchmarks? Especially 3DMark should be run several times (then take the average) since it usually produces different scores.

ASUS P4S533 | Intel Pentium 4 2,261GHz | 512MB Samsung PC2700 DDR-SDRAM | Voodoo 5 5500 AGP
Title: Driver comparison
Post by: qrazi on 11 November 2003, 16:17:43
i did a clean driver install every time...
didnt take average scores, but since i made several attempts (1 every few months... :) ) i dont think the scores a that much off...

not all tests are done in 32-bit... first games like counterstrike and unreal tournament dont run in 32-bit anyway, secondly when playing on a voodoo5, i doubt 32-bit will be used a lot....

anyway:
32-bit benched:
3dmark2001se, quake3arena
16-bit benched:
3dmark2000, counterstrike (1.5), UnrealTournament, Enemy Territory, UT2k3 (demo).
i used the default benchmarks in 3dmarks, the standard demo1 in quake3 (1.11), the intro flyby demo in Unrealtournament, a selfmade offline demo of enemy territory and one of the standard flyby demos from the ut2k3 demo.

i know these results wouldnt be accepted by any professional site, but then again, this is a forum. if anyone wants, i could run the benchmarks several times and take the average... itll cost me a lot of time though...

Title: Driver comparison
Post by: Kyon_CoraeL on 17 February 2004, 04:32:05
Hi I am new here but
QuoteAmigamerlin 3.0
3dmark 2000 :4065
Counterstrike :53.1
Unreal Tournament :78.1
3dmark2001SE :2351
quake3arena :81.0
Enemy Territory :48.79
UT2k3 :66.2

When I use MESA3D and all my settings are Antialiasing fast and edge antialiasing on.
512 MB SDRAM
700MHZ athlon

I get around 65 without MesaFX and 80 with MesaFX