Reply to Problem with Voodoo5 PCI and Sempron 2600 (1.6GHz-s754) on MS-7032 v1.0 (kt8neo-v)

~ 3dfxzone.it ~

~ SFFT Drivers ~

~ MesaFX ~

~ 3D-Analyze ~

~ 3dfx Headlines ~

~ 3dfx Cards ~

Username:	Password:
Save Password
Forgot your Password?

All Forums

3dfx Hardware & Software

Voodoo4/5 Discussions

Problem with Voodoo5 PCI and Sempron 2600 (1.6GHz-s754) on MS-7032 v1.0 (kt8neo-v)

Note: You must be registered in order to post a reply.
To register, click here. Registration is FREE!

Screensize:

UserName:

Password:

Format Mode:

Format:

Message:

* HTML is OFF
* Forum Code is ON

Smilies

[quote][i]Originally posted by pierrickuk[/i]
[br]Hello,

I recently inherited the following combo: Sempron 2600 (1.6GHz) on MS-7032 v1.0. I thought it would be a good platform to receive my voodoo 5 5500 pci (mac card flashed to pc).
I set up Win Xp Pro Version 2002 SP3 and Win 98 se and was a bit surprised by the apparent low performances.
So I ran some benchmarks (3d mark 2001 se).

The results:

AMD Sempron 2600+ (1.6Ghz, L2 cache 128kb)
MSI MS-7032 (k8t-neo-v 1.0, bios 5.1)
1GB DDR 400
Driver: Amigamerlin 3.0 for Voodoo 5500 PCI/DVI (tried later with 3.1 too)

3d mark2001 se v330
Win Xp Pro Version 2002 SP3
With one chip only ===> 1240 3D marks
 default, 2 chips enabled===> 1300 3D Marks

Tried again with Win 98se, with amigamerlin 2.5, all default settings: 1400 3D marks

From the very little difference with one and 2 chips activated,  I thought there was a problem with the card. So I later tried it in an old p3-s 1.4 on ms-6309 with 512 meg SDRAM 133, on which I also have a V5 5500 AGP.
The OS on the p3 machine is WIn98SE +unofficial service pack, driver is Amigamerlin 2.5:

3d mark 2000
V5 PCI: 4708
V5 AGP: 4742

3d mark 2001
V5 PCI: 1907
V5 AGP: 2186

The difference here between the AGP and the PCI is very small, so I concluded that the PCI card is fine.

What do you think the problem is with the sempron+ v5 pci configuration? I have since tried sfft drivers, latest amigamerlin 3.1 R1 drivers and still get the same low result.
Anybody has the same or a similar configuration? Am I missing something obvious in the bios maybe?
Could it be the small cache of the sempron? or just bad luck with hardware compatibility?
[/quote]

File upload: zip or doc extension and size <= 512kb

Image file upload: jpg or jpeg or gif extension and size <= 512kb
Check here to include your profile signature.
Check here to subscribe to this topic.

T O P I C R E V I E W
pierrickuk	Posted - 12/02/2011 : 01:37:41 Hello, I recently inherited the following combo: Sempron 2600 (1.6GHz) on MS-7032 v1.0. I thought it would be a good platform to receive my voodoo 5 5500 pci (mac card flashed to pc). I set up Win Xp Pro Version 2002 SP3 and Win 98 se and was a bit surprised by the apparent low performances. So I ran some benchmarks (3d mark 2001 se). The results: AMD Sempron 2600+ (1.6Ghz, L2 cache 128kb) MSI MS-7032 (k8t-neo-v 1.0, bios 5.1) 1GB DDR 400 Driver: Amigamerlin 3.0 for Voodoo 5500 PCI/DVI (tried later with 3.1 too) 3d mark2001 se v330 Win Xp Pro Version 2002 SP3 With one chip only ===> 1240 3D marks default, 2 chips enabled===> 1300 3D Marks Tried again with Win 98se, with amigamerlin 2.5, all default settings: 1400 3D marks From the very little difference with one and 2 chips activated, I thought there was a problem with the card. So I later tried it in an old p3-s 1.4 on ms-6309 with 512 meg SDRAM 133, on which I also have a V5 5500 AGP. The OS on the p3 machine is WIn98SE +unofficial service pack, driver is Amigamerlin 2.5: 3d mark 2000 V5 PCI: 4708 V5 AGP: 4742 3d mark 2001 V5 PCI: 1907 V5 AGP: 2186 The difference here between the AGP and the PCI is very small, so I concluded that the PCI card is fine. What do you think the problem is with the sempron+ v5 pci configuration? I have since tried sfft drivers, latest amigamerlin 3.1 R1 drivers and still get the same low result. Anybody has the same or a similar configuration? Am I missing something obvious in the bios maybe? Could it be the small cache of the sempron? or just bad luck with hardware compatibility?
2 L A T E S T R E P L I E S (Newest First)
pierrickuk	Posted - 18/02/2011 : 04:35:31 Well, I haven't tried with different drivers, instead I tried with a different card: a v3-3000 16 meg pci. the results are as follow: In both case, OS is Windows 98se + latest unofficial service pack. PIII-s 1.4 @1582 fsb:150, sdram:133 3dmark2000 3362 3dmark2001 1789 Sempron2600 @1864MHz fsb:233, sdram:233 3dmark2000 2787 3dmark2001 1521 You can see some screenshots with more details on this thread (in French): http://forum.hardware.fr/forum2.php?config=hfr.inc&cat=1&subcat=109&post=567660&page=1&p=1&sondage=0&owntopic=0&trash=0&trash_post=0&print=0&numreponse=7799101"e_only=0&new=0&nojs=0#t7799101 What do you think? The difference in performance can also be felt in games. I tried Supreme snowboarding (glide3, 1280x1024, 16 bits, max settings for game details), it is definitely smoother on the P3. At 1024x768, not much difference. I am very interested in feedback from people with the same mobo (or equivalent) to try to find out where the problem is. To H-street, I will try latest official drivers when I have the time.
H-street	Posted - 17/02/2011 : 18:05:38 how does it behave under win98se with the latest official 3dfx drivers?

Forum Rules

Legal Info

Privacy

Contact Us

3dfxzone.it

HWSetup.it

ForumZone.it