"Final Reality" Benchmark - V2SLI beats V5

Started by trigger, 17 August 2005, 14:52:34

Previous topic - Next topic

trigger


Voodoo2 SLI beats Voodoo5 5500?

The screenshot below shows a comparison between the two. Both done on the exact same PC.
The purple bar is the Voodoo5 5500(PCI 1.18DVI Bios)



Overall Reality Marks for the Voodoo2SLI was 6.63, while the Voodoo5 5500 only got 6.16.
But check out the fill rate what goes on there? [V]

AOPEN MX3S (Pentium 1GHz) 512Mb PC133 SDRAM
Windows 98
FastVoodoo2 4.6
Raziel64 Evolution Driver Expert Edition V1.00.09  

Can anyone provide me their results? Especially the fill rate!
Go Postal! :D

You can grab the benchmark here!
http://www.instantnetworks.net/mirror/finalreality/
Voodoo5 5500 AGP
Voodoo5 5500 PCI DVI x3 (exorcised MAC cards)
Voodoo4 4500 PCI
Voodoo2 1000 PCI x4 (two boxed and factory sealed)
Voodoo1
miroHISCORE 3D
Canopus PURE3D

kaneda-san

Powered by:
Pentium 2  350 Slot 1
3dfx Vodoo 4500 32 Vram Napalm AGP | OEM( L-Card )
64 MB ram pc 100 ;D

Chips

I know I've already sent this to you Trigger, but just showing everyone else here - I'm using WinXP Amigamerlin R11.  Fill rate seems fine here.  Does Win98 really make a difference?

Image Insert:

55.94 KB
My XP home Collection...

Voodoo2 8Mb + Nvidia FX5200, Intel PIII-1.13Ghz, MS-6315
Voodoo5 5500 MAC PCI SLI, Intel PII 400, Intel P6LX-A+
Voodoo2 12Mb (SLI) + Geforce2 MX400, AMD K6-III+ 600Mhz, Jetway ALI 542C
Radeon 9250, Intel PIII 1Ghz, ABIT BE6
Radeon 9200SE, AMD K6-III+ 550Mhz, PC PARTNER VIA MVP3
Geforce 7800 GO, Centrino Duo 2.16Ghz, Dell Inspiron 9400

trigger

#3
Yep.. I've tried different drivers under windows 98 but all return a crap fill rate.

If anyone has a decent fill rate for the voodoo5 5500 under Windows 98 please post details.

Much apprieciated.
Voodoo5 5500 AGP
Voodoo5 5500 PCI DVI x3 (exorcised MAC cards)
Voodoo4 4500 PCI
Voodoo2 1000 PCI x4 (two boxed and factory sealed)
Voodoo1
miroHISCORE 3D
Canopus PURE3D

NitroX infinity

I think the problem here is the CPU which only runs at 1GHz. Someone should compare the two with a more powerfull CPU (2400+/2.6GHz)

The Voodoo 5 isn't maxed out here because the CPU can't supply enough data to it.
 

Raff3DC

Well, it's not Win98 and no fillrate ... but a nice result. :D Voodoo2 won't ever reach that.



Tbred @ ~218x11 = 2392 MHz, 3dfx Voodoo5 5500 PCI 64 MiB @ 190/190, SFFT Alpha 32.

Greetings from Germany,
Raff

The biggest Voodoo5 6000 test ever: http://3dcenter.de/artikel/voodoo5-6000/

Chips

QuoteOriginally posted by NitroX infinity

I think the problem here is the CPU which only runs at 1GHz. Someone should compare the two with a more powerfull CPU (2400+/2.6GHz)

The Voodoo 5 isn't maxed out here because the CPU can't supply enough data to it.

Umm, so how do you explain my fill rate with the K6-III+ 550Mhz??:)
My XP home Collection...

Voodoo2 8Mb + Nvidia FX5200, Intel PIII-1.13Ghz, MS-6315
Voodoo5 5500 MAC PCI SLI, Intel PII 400, Intel P6LX-A+
Voodoo2 12Mb (SLI) + Geforce2 MX400, AMD K6-III+ 600Mhz, Jetway ALI 542C
Radeon 9250, Intel PIII 1Ghz, ABIT BE6
Radeon 9200SE, AMD K6-III+ 550Mhz, PC PARTNER VIA MVP3
Geforce 7800 GO, Centrino Duo 2.16Ghz, Dell Inspiron 9400