Print Page - Intel Extreme(-ly slow) Graphics vs Voodoo2

Title: Intel Extreme(-ly slow) Graphics vs Voodoo2
Post by: secretfj on 25 July 2004, 07:04:24

I wanna ask for playing OpenGL/DirectX Games which one will have better performance? (Voodoo w/o SLI)
and how about getting a pair of Voodoo2 with SLi enabled?

the intel one is 845GL w/ Overclock to 160FSB

thanks

Title: Intel Extreme(-ly slow) Graphics vs Voodoo2
Post by: ArchAngelCD on 26 July 2004, 06:19:45

A Voodoo2 SLI setup won't run faster than a single Voodoo2 card but the SLI setup will run at 1024X768 where the single Voodoo2 card will only do 800X600.

Title: Intel Extreme(-ly slow) Graphics vs Voodoo2
Post by: amp_man on 26 July 2004, 07:34:37

hmm, methinks intel extreme has only directx support, no opengl, so no comparison there, V2 is winner by default. On D3D, I really don't know, but it couldn't hurt to hook it up and give it a whirl

Title: Intel Extreme(-ly slow) Graphics vs Voodoo2
Post by: Int9h on 12 September 2004, 09:24:45

Voodoo 2 - 2490 3DMarks
    - 5442 CPU 3DMarks

Trident Blade 3D
    - 1762 3DMarks
    - 5394 3DMarks

Title: Intel Extreme(-ly slow) Graphics vs Voodoo2
Post by: Int9h on 12 September 2004, 09:28:00

System:
VIA C3 800Mhz (EPIA 800 MiniITX Board)
13Gb WD Harddisk
Creative Labs Voodoo 2 8Mb
ugly onboard graphics

Lets Fight :)

Benchmark: 3DMark99

Voodoo 2

2490 3DMarks
5442 CPU 3DMarks

Trident Blade 3D

1762 3DMarks
5394 3DMarks

3dfxzone.it WorldWide Community

3dfx Hardware & Software => Voodoo2 Discussions => Topic started by: secretfj on 25 July 2004, 07:04:24